<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Squidink Communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squidink.com.au/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squidink.com.au</link>
	<description>words that sell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pretty&#8230; and useful&#8230; Wordles</title>
		<link>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/07/pretty-and-usefulwordles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/07/pretty-and-usefulwordles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squidink.com.au/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I&#8217;ve created a Wordle of my blog.

Ain&#8217;t it pretty? All those words I love, like &#8220;creative&#8221; and &#8220;writing&#8221; and &#8220;web&#8221;, jump out at me. It&#8217;s pretty easy, by skim-reading this Wordle, to guess what I do, isn&#8217;t it? And it&#8217;s also easy to see where I need to build on topics, in a bid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;ve created a <a href="http://www.wordle.net" target="_blank">Wordle</a> of my blog.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-144 aligncenter" title="blog-wordle" src="http://www.squidink.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/blog-wordle.jpg" alt="blog-wordle" width="496" height="326" /></p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t it pretty? All those words I love, like &#8220;creative&#8221; and &#8220;writing&#8221; and &#8220;web&#8221;, jump out at me. It&#8217;s pretty easy, by skim-reading this Wordle, to guess what I do, isn&#8217;t it? And it&#8217;s also easy to see where I need to build on topics, in a bid to drive more traffic from certain keywords.</p>
<p>Web content managers can use the same trick to check whether their content is on target in terms of keyword frequency.</p>
<p>PS. Thanks to copywriting compadre Glenn Murray for his great post – <a href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/guest-posts/seo-copywriting-is-dead-here%E2%80%99s-proof/" target="_blank">SEO Copywriting is Dead! Here&#8217;s Proof&#8230;</a> – which introduced my to the wonderful world of Wordles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/07/pretty-and-usefulwordles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beating writer&#8217;s block</title>
		<link>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/06/beating-writers-block/</link>
		<comments>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/06/beating-writers-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squidink.com.au/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went for a run last night through thick fog. It was quite beautiful to watch the oncoming headlights diffuse through filaments of white; but it was also quite eerie when the light disappeared and I was wrapped in a blanket of nothing.
That&#8217;s sometimes how my brain feels when I&#8217;m tackling a new piece of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went for a run last night through thick fog. It was quite beautiful to watch the oncoming headlights diffuse through filaments of white; but it was also quite eerie when the light disappeared and I was wrapped in a blanket of nothing.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s sometimes how my brain feels when I&#8217;m tackling a new piece of creative copywriting. <strong>Moments of brilliance; then nothing.</strong></p>
<p>Otherwise known as writer&#8217;s block, I guess. So what are my <strong>top five tactics</strong> for overcoming this most pernicious writing ailment?</p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span></p>
<p><strong>1. Step outside the job. </strong>Say I&#8217;m working on an eDM for a financial institution and am stuck for a hook. Instead of sitting there staring at a blank screen for half an hour, I&#8217;ll be productive with my time and flick through a recent issue of <em>Money</em>, or trawl a couple of news sites, to further brush up on the topic.</p>
<p><strong>2. Jump into something easier.</strong> Often, the hardest part of a piece is the heading/subject line/opening para. Generally, I leave this until last. By tackling the meatier sections first, I become so immersed in the topic I&#8217;m writing about that it&#8217;s relatively easy to come back and nail the opener.</p>
<p><strong>3. Talk to myself. </strong>Sounds crazy, but I can often work my way through the problem by having a <em>conversation with myself</em> about the topic. &#8220;So, Bec, why do you need this financial product?&#8221; &#8220;Well, Bec, I&#8217;ve been thinking about my future a lot more lately, wondering how on earth I&#8217;m going to save enough for a deposit on a house&#8230;&#8221; And so it goes on. It might stem from my multimedia/scriptwriting days when I always had to read my work back to myself to ensure it sounded OK when spoken.</p>
<p><strong>4. Re-read my notes. </strong>I will close my laptop and pull out my briefing notes, armed with a highlighter and a pen. I&#8217;ll go over these and pull out all the key points, and jot down some words/phrases which support these key points. It&#8217;s a good chance to go back to an old-fashioned brainstorm.</p>
<p><strong>5. Admit defeat. </strong>I always acknowledge when I&#8217;m <em>really </em>stuck, and will leave the job for the rest of the day and complete another (less creative) job instead. There&#8217;s no point in trying to force creativity when it&#8217;s just not there.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s always coffee. That seems to get the creative juices flowing nicely.</p>
<p>So what are your tactics to beat writer&#8217;s block?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/06/beating-writers-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to find a brand&#8217;s voice?</title>
		<link>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/how-to-find-a-brands-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/how-to-find-a-brands-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torquay.myownserver.net/~squidink/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a copywriter and communications strategist, I&#8217;m often asked to help a business find its voice. It&#8217;s a challenging and rewarding task.
The business owner or marketing manager knows how they want to sound, but don&#8217;t know how to make that sound. They might say, &#8220;We want to sound like Virgin.&#8221; Or, &#8220;We want to sound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a copywriter and communications strategist, I&#8217;m often asked to help a business <strong>find its voice</strong>. It&#8217;s a challenging and rewarding task.</p>
<p>The business owner or marketing manager knows how they <em>want</em> to sound, but don&#8217;t know <em>how </em>to make that sound. They might say, &#8220;We want to sound like Virgin.&#8221; Or, &#8220;We want to sound cool, clever, and creative.&#8221;</p>
<p>But one person&#8217;s cool and clever is another person&#8217;s condescending and dumb.</p>
<p><span id="more-79"></span></p>
<p>The first thing I do when helping a business find its voice is to have conversations. With the CEO/business owner, with the sales team, with the receptionist. I get a handle on the culture of the company.</p>
<p>I then start playing around with the language which emerges and apply it to a piece of communications – a brochure, web page or letter. It will soon become evident to my client whether the writing is too conversational, or too dry.</p>
<p>This <strong>process of trial and error</strong> is invaluable. Because language is a subjective thing – and what a client <em>thinks</em> they&#8217;ve asked for may be different to what I&#8217;ve heard.</p>
<p>Once we&#8217;ve agreed on the tone, it&#8217;s easy to refine the communications guidelines and make them unique to the business. You can stipulate all manner of things relating to the voice, language and writing:</p>
<ul>
<li>Tone</li>
<li>Keywords or buzzwords</li>
<li>Use of bullet points or lists</li>
<li>Openings and closings</li>
<li>Punctuation</li>
<li>Length of sentences and paragraphs</li>
</ul>
<p>The list goes on. By investing a bit of time in developing a communications guide, you will not only &#8220;find your voice&#8221; but have the confidence to use it time and again.</p>
<p>How did your business find its voice? I&#8217;d love to hear from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/how-to-find-a-brands-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to WordPress, Squidink</title>
		<link>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/welcome-to-wordpress-squidink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/welcome-to-wordpress-squidink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torquay.myownserver.net/~squidink/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s time I practised what I preach.
I&#8217;ve finally moved my site over to WordPress, following a number of years using an excruciating CMS which wasn&#8217;t very search-friendly. The decision was a no-brainer:

WordPress gives my site greater search engine visibility
It&#8217;s cheap
It&#8217;s clean and simple to use.

Of course, it takes a while to get the hang of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time I practised what I preach.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve finally moved my site over to <a href="http://www.wordpress.org" target="_blank">WordPress</a>, following a number of years using an excruciating CMS which wasn&#8217;t very search-friendly. The decision was a no-brainer:</p>
<ul>
<li>WordPress gives my site greater search engine visibility</li>
<li>It&#8217;s cheap</li>
<li>It&#8217;s clean and simple to use.</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, it takes a while to get the hang of it. And I was incredibly lucky to have <a href="http://www.jackmcintyre.net" target="_blank">Jack</a> on hand to answer my questions (OK, he basically set the whole thing up for me).</p>
<p>But now that it&#8217;s up and running, I&#8217;m away. Watch this space for new additions – it&#8217;s so easy to use that I&#8217;ll want to spend all my time in here updating and refining my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/welcome-to-wordpress-squidink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writing for the web</title>
		<link>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/writing-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/writing-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torquay.myownserver.net/~squidink/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less is best when you write for the web. But it&#8217;s not as easy as it looks. Writing for the web is not simply a matter of cutting and pasting your corporate brochure into the relevant pages of your website. Nor is it the place for your marketing department to wax lyrical in a creative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less is best when you write for the web. But it&#8217;s not as easy as it looks. Writing for the web is not simply a matter of cutting and pasting your corporate brochure into the relevant pages of your website. Nor is it the place for your marketing department to wax lyrical in a creative stream of consciousness.</p>
<p>So what does writing for the web involve?</p>
<p><span id="more-38"></span></p>
<h3>Sell the proposition: keep it short</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s about capturing the attention of your audience in the few seconds they spend scanning your page.</p>
<p>Every word on your site must earn its place. Convincing clients that less is best is one of the more difficult tasks I face as a web copywriter. When a client agrees to a fee for copywriting, the idea that they&#8217;re only paying for about 200 words per web page (which doesn&#8217;t look like much on paper, believe me) is often hard to grasp.</p>
<p>But when you consider that those 200 words are carefully selected and crafted to capture the reader&#8217;s very short attention span, you get an idea of how hard it can be.</p>
<p>Consider this. 79% of web users &#8217;scan&#8217; pages, and only 16% read them word for word (Jakob Nielsen).</p>
<p>A web user wants to find the information they need as quickly as possible. If they have to wade through dense paragraphs of information to find what they&#8217;re looking for, chances are you&#8217;ll lose them before you&#8217;ve finished your first marketing punchline.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;re writing for the web, remember these pointers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Start the page with the conclusion</li>
<li>Improve scannability: use bolding and bulleted lists</li>
<li>Avoid creative copywriting: keep it simple</li>
<li>Headings and sub-headings as statements of fact</li>
</ul>
<h3>The &#8216;brevity&#8217; mantra doesn&#8217;t always apply</h3>
<p>Consider this article. You&#8217;ve drilled down to this page from the home page &#8211; or scored a direct hit from Google &#8211; and you&#8217;re here because you want to learn more about how to write well on the web. You might be printing the article out to file in your &#8216;useful business tools&#8217; folder (I can only hope). In short, you want more than just a few sound bytes of information.</p>
<p>I hope this article has been useful to you, and welcome your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/writing-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self editing: yes or no?</title>
		<link>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/self-editing-yes-or-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/self-editing-yes-or-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torquay.myownserver.net/~squidink/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editing is a golden rule of good copy. But how much can be achieved by editing your own work? No matter how fine-toothed your comb, you are bound to neglect some messy grammar here or a stray comma there, simply because you are too close to the job.
Where possible, you should get a fresh set [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editing is a golden rule of good copy. But how much can be achieved by editing your own work? No matter how fine-toothed your comb, you are bound to neglect some messy grammar here or a stray comma there, simply because you are <strong>too close to the job</strong>.</p>
<p>Where possible, you should get a fresh set of eyes to review your work. Because when it comes to business communication, you can&#8217;t afford to make mistakes.</p>
<p><span id="more-34"></span></p>
<p>Who to use? It may be a colleague, or someone removed from your organisation. As long as they have a firm grasp of your communication objectives and your corporate style and brand, then your editor will certainly add value to the project.</p>
<h3>Editing websites</h3>
<p>Web masters and online marketers responsible for large websites – I&#8217;m talking about sites with multiple content owners and deep layers of pages – need to think more carefully about editing web content.</p>
<p>Too often, I see websites with inconsistent or repetitive content. It&#8217;s because there are so many people involved with different sections of the site – and these people don&#8217;t have time to check out what other people are doing.</p>
<p>If you assign one person to review all web content before it is published to the site, then you will start to see the following improvements:</p>
<ul>
<li>Consistency of tone and language</li>
<li>Reduced word count (web editors are adept at saying things with less words)</li>
<li>Stronger brand message</li>
<li>Logical links between IA and content</li>
</ul>
<p>Depending on the number of new pages your organisation publishes, you may need an editor for a couple of hours or one day per week.</p>
<h3>Self-editing has its place</h3>
<p>You will certainly make the editor&#8217;s job easier if you review your work first. Ask yourself, &#8220;Am I telling the reader what I want them to know?&#8221;</p>
<p>Once you are sure that your document addresses all of your communications objectives, and you&#8217;re satisfied with the amount of information provided, you can hand it over to the editor.</p>
<p>And if, for whatever reason, you can&#8217;t use an editor, then make sure you proofread it at least three times &#8211; each time checking for a different item (eg grammar, punctuation, active voice).</p>
<p>I am the first to admit that, on occasion, I have thought myself capable of editing my own copy. Mistakes inevitably creep through. As do the web crimes of passive voice and sloppy sentences. But only sometimes, I hope.</p>
<p>I hope this article has been useful to you, and welcome your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.squidink.com.au/2009/05/self-editing-yes-or-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
